Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Katz's avatar

I have been practicing fine and applied visual art for 50 years. I began using digital software and hardware in 1981 while working at NBC Television. I have investigated Dalle and Mid-journey and quickly realized their dependence on language and inability to express the ineffable visually. Your observations have been instrumental in explaining my rejection of AI for producing personally expressive visual art. Thank you for what you do.

Expand full comment
Ondřej Frei's avatar

Thank you Erik for another insightful piece, and hope everything is good now with your health!

> Real intelligence is embodied. It exists within a living system, interacting dynamically with an environment. AI, on the other hand, is an abstraction. It predicts text sequences, not causes and consequences.

For some time now, I've been encountering approaches to "embody" AI by equipping it with sensors etc. But fundamentally, my instinct tells me that any such attempts are doomed to still fail because conceptually, pairing an abstraction with another abstraction cannot produce a concretion. (If the underlying assumption was right, "autonomous" vehicles would be the closest thing to AGI, right... ?) Do you have any thoughts on this? Is my intuition off and can these "artificial embodiment" attempts succeed in an unexpected way, similarly to how LLMs got great at mimicking understanding without possessing any?

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts